Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan Post wrote: > > Erwin- > > I was fascinated by your post. I was pleasantly surprised to find that Good ><Snip> tives done in the old Microdol-X seemed thinner than they actually were! > > I agree with you, Erwin, that some sort of 'densitometer' is almost a > necessity (Sorry, Mark! I gotta disagree with you!- but I still love ya!). > For most of my needs, and the needs of my friends, the good ole Beseler > color analyzers make pretty decent 'densitometers',><Snip> Dan again i have nothing of course against densitometry. It is a great thing. Not sure that if i had one it would have constant use but at the beginning I'd play with it franticly for a year or so, time permitting. It's just the probes i rebel against!! The closed loup no test strip approach to printing. All loops should be open and assessable to diversity! As in get a timer which beeps or get a metronome and make test strips... real hard evidence! mark rabiner :) http://spokenword.to/rabiner/ Do know much about densitometry! Think it's nifty as cold Iced tea! but i do know that I love you! and i know if what you say is true! what a wonderful world it would be!