Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: What's wrong with the 24?
From: "Tony Woo" <tonywoo@netvigator.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:12:34 +0800
References: <3A0200AC.5DE7B158@yahoo.com> <003f01c0450f$76216560$9f0fbed4@tip2400> <200011030622.WAA01557@spoon.alink.net>
 
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brick" <jim@brick.org>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 2:19 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: What's wrong with the 24?


> I bought a 24 in 1976 with my R3. I used it for twenty years with R3, R4,
> R6, and R7's. It was one of my most used lenses and I was never
> disappointed. Great lens.
>
> Jim


I have the same favorable feelings about the R24 lens, a rather strong one in
fact.  About a year ago I traded my old R24 for a new R19.  But eversince, I
missed the R24 so much I had to buy it back recently. No matter what the others
are saying about it, I am very happy with the images I took with it.

QUESTION TO JIM:   Are you still as enthusiastic about your R350/4.8 lens as
you have been before?


Thanks and Cheers,
Tony
In reply to: Message from Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com> ([Leica] What's wrong with the 24?)
Message from "Bernard Degaute" <bernard.degaute@village.uunet.be> (Re : : [Leica] First time success)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: What's wrong with the 24?)