Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It seems that if the buying public stops caring whether a print is inkjet or silver they will care even less whether the image was recorded on silver or silicon. The distinctions will fade away, except maybe in the museum world where it will be "gelatin silver print from a gelatin silver negative" vs a whateveryouwanttocallthisdigitalthing! Mike D - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Johnston" <michaeljohnston@ameritech.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:47 PM Subject: [Leica] Cybergraphs, digitography, D.I., digital "photography" > I think digital photography is the best color photography I've ever seen. > I've seen good color photo_graphs_ plenty of times--isolated examples--but > digital prints can blow me away. I don't really know exactly why; the fact > that they can record a much longer scale, the fact that the colors can be > pure. I don't know. > > And, on the other hand, I'm really solidly in the camp that thinks that > digital imaging isn't photography. Well, okay, so you can use it almost as > if it were. So? I think it's a different animal, a new paradigm. I'm not > saying better or worse. Photography is an imprint; a _physical record_ > caused by the action of light. Digital imaging is a new medium that's > related to photography, a descendant of it. Maybe an improvement. But not > the same species. > > --Mike > > >