Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: M6 and Landrovers
From: "Wilber Jeffcoat" <wilber@jeffcoatphotography.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:26:02 -0400
References: <200010260536.WAA17503@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <000f01c03f44$78778a40$565814cf@z4r4k8> <39F833A9.ADBF51DB@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

Why is a LandRover "Defender" Impractical????
Cheers Wilber
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: M6 and Landrovers


> Bill Lawlor wrote:
> >
> > "overheard" on the Contax/Yashica SLR list.
> >
> > But on the other hand the Tessar is a pure classic. A lens like this
will
> > never be built again, and to own it is something special, just as
> > impractical yet fascinating as a Leica M6 and a Landrover Defender.
> >
> > Marcus
> >
> ><Snip>
> Except that there are so many Tessars out there all the time by every
company
> imaginary. Not the main issue I know. Just called Different names.
Voigtländer
> Tessars are thier Color-Skopar.
> Mark rabiner
>

In reply to: Message from "Bill Lawlor" <wvl@marinternet.com> ([Leica] Re: M6 and Landrovers)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: M6 and Landrovers)