Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nova processors
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 06:43:04 -0700
References: <B61D8849.4BD%michaeljohnston@ameritech.net>

Mike Johnston wrote:
> 
> > Too bad it only comes in 8x10 and 12x16.  If available in 16x20, I'd buy one
> > now.  Monday is my 32nd birthday.  (I bought 8x10 Quad for my birthday last
> > year.)
> 
> Ken,
> I'd guess they're not the perfect thing for people who do a lot of printing
> or for big paper. 16x20 is probably a lot easier to handle in trays.
><Snip> 
Minor White calls 20x24's not archival because they are too large to be stored properly.
My darkroom is set up for them. Horizontally though not vertically! I have an 18
ft sink!. But 16x20's are more than twice as easy to print with one third the
chemistry so i charge accordingly.
16x20's are handy dandy in comparison they fit under your arm in a portfolio.
My mats for them are 20x24 as are the frames on my walls.
mark rabiner

In reply to: Message from Mike Johnston <michaeljohnston@ameritech.net> ([Leica] Nova processors)