Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> >> I have this on very good authority and we have argued this before. Q.E.D. > > But how can we believe you if you're not willing to name your sources!?! > > ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) Very funny, Howard. Actually my source on this is impeccable: the late Erich Hartmann, who was a friend, and who was one of the "second group" of photographers to join Magnum after the founders, and was President of Magnum for a time, and knew Cartier well for years. I asked Erich about it and Erich inquired for me, and what he reported back was that Cartier has typically used whatever is the latest Leica body at the time, from the M3 to the M6, but that he has always favored the collapsible 50mm Summicron from the first half of the fifties. There was some speculation that Leica multicoated the lens for Henri after multicoating was more common, but I've never been able to confirm that. Erich also said that Cartier carried a 35mm and a 90mm but so seldom used them that you can go through entire proof books and not come across a single frame taken with either of those focal lengths. He really "saw" with the 50mm, although I think there is also ample evidence that, like every other photographer, he experimented with different lenses from time to time. I did get to page through several of Cartier's proof books at Magnum New York. An interesting experience. Erich was a wonderful gentleman, erudite, opinionated, and a true friend to his friends. It was a very sad day when he died. - --Mike