Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Incidentally, painful as it is to admit, ad people are wonderful at titles. We could call the project "Camay Bath Beads." Or "Dodge Valiant II." How about "You deserve a break today!" (Now how did _that_ come to mind?) <g> - --Mike Seriously, I would rather talk about Leica photography. A project like what you're talking about is a huge undertaking, and it requires a hell of a lot more than earnestness and hopefulness to bring it off. What you're most likely to do is to waste a lot of time and effort and come up with a motley collection of crap that collectively adds up to nothing. And, if I may be so bold, I would venture to suggest that the brilliant core concept will, er, occur to others...in fact, doubtless already has. Others, that is, who have far better resources to bring it off. Such as a museum--for instance, the institution that did it the first time. Anyway, I think the whole thing was a dubious concept 45 years ago, and that in any event, its time has emphatically passed. The original had a lot to do with the ideas of Albert Schweitzer being current at the time, ideas that, to put it mildly, seem quaint today. Not that I mean to throw cold water, but most photographers don't even have the discipline to complete a personal portfolio.