Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Luna Pro Digital
From: "SML" <inyoung@jps.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:38:36 +0100
References: <200010100701.AAA29140@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <4.1.20001010135729.023ae4a0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>

Does anybody know what the difference is between Luna Star F and Luna Star
F2?

Thanks,
David

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:00 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Luna Pro Digital


> At 12:07 PM 10/10/00 -0400, Douglas Cooper wrote:
> >At 12:01 AM 10/10/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> >> > Get a digital Gossen Luna Pro digital. It has so many great features,
> >> > you'll be amazed. ... Super meter,
> >
> >A nice meter.  I used it for a bit, but marginally prefer the Luna Star
F2
> >-- more robust construction, and I prefer the feel of the buttons.  Also,
a
> >swivelling head, which makes incident readings *much* easier.  But it's
> >pricier, and a bit larger.  Either meter is good.
> >
> >Douglas Cooper
>
>
> I have both meters and the F2 is indeed a great incident meter and flash
> meter. The Luna Pro is a great 25 degree reflected meter or occasional
> incident meter, with the exact same electronics as the F2. I use both and
> don't get mixed-up... :-)
>
> The best meters...
>
> Jim
>

In reply to: Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Luna Pro Digital)