Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Brian It is great to know that you are putting up a nice set as the grand prize for a proposed photo contest. While the contest rules may be easier to establish, I am not sure about the means test to verify the deserving party. Dan K. At 07:17 PM 9/10/00 -0700, you wrote: >I have a Leica IIIf, red dial, with 3 lenses (35/3.5 Summar, 50/2.8 >collapsible Elmarit (I think), 90/4 Elmar), 3 finders that I believe are >called "imarect" (they attach to the flash shoe). I also have a Tower >135/5.6 for it that is not wonderful. The 50/2.8 is an unbelievably good >lens and the finders, especially the 50 finder, are amazingly wonderful. > >I am the second owner of this camera; I bought it used around 1970 from a >Baltimore Sun photographer who was retiring. The Sun permitted the use of >Leicas in those days; most papers didn't. I have shot about 2000 rolls of >film with it through the years, mostly Tri-X. The camera looks like what >you'd expect it to look like after being owned by a newspaper photographer >and then me. Not a museum piece, but not damaged in any way. > >I have an M6 now, for which I am very thankful. So I don't use the IIIf any >more. I don't believe in owning cameras that I don't use. But this old IIIf >means a lot to me, so I don't want to sell it. However, I think I might be >willing to give it away as the prize in a Leica Users Photo Contest. Before >I announce such a contest I'd like to see some discussion about what sort >of contest it should be and what restrictions I'd place on the winner. For >example, I don't think any working or retired professional photographer >should be eligible to win. My goal here is twofold: > 1. To get this camera into the hands of some needy person who will >really use it, instead of putting it in a display case. An engineer with a >mortgage who lives in Arizona is probably not needy; a student who lives in >the former East Germany and who works in a grocery store is probably needy. >But only if he's really going to use it. > 2. To increase the amount of discussion about photography, instead of >cameras, in this forum. I'm absolutely delighted at the pictures that some >of you post; I keep hoping that someday I'll have something new I'm willing >to show you all (I'm very proud of my old work, but I haven't managed to >take a picture that makes me quiver in a long time). Maybe this contest >would stir the pot. > >Any ideas for rules? I have a pretty good idea of who I'd want the judges >to be, but the decision would be based both on photographic quality and on >need. I want the entire setup to go to the same person, rather than having >the kidney go here and the liver go there and the corneas go over there. > >Brian Reid > >