Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The color one is meant to be 'muted' and 'pastel'. But 'lifeless' is another way of looking at it, I guess. As to whether it's a good sample... it's not a sample... it's a genuine question I was asking myself. - -- Johnny Deadman http://www.pinkheadedbug.com > From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net> > Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 10:44:48 -0400 > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] a rose is a rose is a rose (more color v bw) > >> Not my usual schtick at all... but which is better? >> >> http://www.zing.com/album/pictures.html?id=4293537785 > > I would have to vote for the B&W conversion. The color original is really > lifeless looking and devoid of any sparkle. So I do not think this was a > good sample for us to judge. If there was more color in the 'color' version > I may have voted different considering the subject matter. > > Steve > Annapolis