Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] a rose is a rose is a rose (more color v bw)
From: Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 11:14:08 -0400

The color one is meant to be 'muted' and 'pastel'. But 'lifeless' is another
way of looking at it, I guess. As to whether it's a good sample... it's not
a sample... it's a genuine question I was asking myself.
- -- 
Johnny Deadman

http://www.pinkheadedbug.com


> From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net>
> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 10:44:48 -0400
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] a rose is a rose is a rose (more color v bw)
> 
>> Not my usual schtick at all... but which is better?
>> 
>> http://www.zing.com/album/pictures.html?id=4293537785
> 
> I would have to vote for the B&W conversion. The color original is really
> lifeless looking and devoid of any sparkle. So I do not think this was a
> good sample for us to judge. If there was more color in the 'color' version
> I may have voted different considering the subject matter.
> 
> Steve
> Annapolis