Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Photokina LUG report (1b)
From: Mikiro <arbos@silva.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 14:43:14 +0200

Jem and Lucien,

If memory serves, Leica told us that a 35-50-90 lens is possible.  But they
also urged us to imagine how much such a lens would obstruct the 35mm frame.

Cheers,

Mikiro

on 2/10/00 1:09 PM, Jem Kime wrote:

> Lucien,
> thanks for this, I must admit that upon re-reading my notes it seemed more
> unlikely than likely.
> Sorry for the confusion, I'll delete this from further reproduction.
> Jem
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucien [SMTP:director@ubi.edu]
> Sent: 02 October 2000 11:13
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Photokina LUG report (1b)
> 
> Jem Kime wrote:
> 
>> Lucien - Will there be any different Tri-Elmars?
>> Leica -    Certainly, a 35 - 50 - 90 is not a problem.
> 
> Jem,
> 
> I didn't ask that question and maybe I'm wrong, but I don't
> think the answer was so affirmative.
> 
> 
> Lucien
>