Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/29[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
On 29 Sep 00, at 15:44, Johnny Deadman wrote: > I think the 50 is, pardon me, the spare prick at the wedding here. You end > up with a 35 and a 50 or a 90 and a 50 or a 35 and a 90. The only sensible > combination here is the last one, so the 50 is surplus to requirements. If > you had a 28 and a 90 I might sing a different tune. Thought you just dumped your 90, or did you have another? If I'm travelling very light, it's one body with the 35. Slightly heavier, the TE 90 is in my pocket. A bit more during the day, the 50 'cron, night, the Noctilux (and I leave the TE at home). If I take two bodies, one has the 'cron 50, the other the 35, but if I do that, I might as well pack the other lenses, including the 15. Tim S.