Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Elmar-M 50mm f/2.8
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 20:05:50 -0700
References: <3.0.2.32.20000927063642.010144cc@pacific.net.sg>

D Khong wrote:
> 
> Terry Sham wrote:
> >I would like to buy a M6 TTL 0.72 next week. Because of my tight budget, I
> >would like to buy a cheapest lens (I don't like used) with it. I am
> >considering a Elmar-M 50mm f/2.8 because of its low price and design.
> >However, I am concerning about the build and optical quality of the lens
> >comparing with the Summicron, Summilix and the Noctilux. I think I will buy
> >a Noctilux in the future when I save enough money because I really like
> >standard lenses.
> >
> >Thanks for your inputs
> 
> I think f2.8 lenses are great value for money. The Elmar 50/2.8 can be used
> wide open, collapsible (if you like that feature), and I am happy with the
> results. To me, the fast films of today have actually done great credit to
> slower lenses.
> 
> Dan K.

And having a slightly slower lens does not make for a dimmer less snappy groundglass.
As we don't have no groundglass.
markwr

In reply to: Message from D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg> (Re: [Leica] Elmar-M 50mm f/2.8)