Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bill, and Tom Finnegan: Thanks to both of you for responding to my questions. I think I'll give Tri-X and HP5 a try to start. Boy, I wish I had time to do the darkroom work but it ain't possible. I can remember back when print time stretched out for hours and seemed like minutes. Time really went fast in the darkroom. It was easy to forget to eat even. And when finished, the feet and back were sore. But, there's nothing quite like watching a print develop before your eyes in the tray. John Bill Lawlor wrote: > > John, I use the 35/50/90 combo you have. They are superb. The M6 > meter will be a reliable guide to start. Eventually you will learn > when to deviate from it. Tri-X remains a popular classic film with > forgiving exposure latitude and beautiful gradation. It is ideal for > available light. TMX-100 is probably too slow for available light and > overkill unless you need great big enlargements. Also, it is a > tempermental film with exacting exposure requirements compared to > Tri-X. > > If you are using a photofinisher Tri-X is a good bet. The c41 b&w > films can be handled by a knowledgable mini lab. Doing your own > darkroom work is the best if you can. Some cities have rental > darkrooms and classes at adult ed programs. > > The digital option is worth considering, I hear. > > Good luck, Bill Lawlor