Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>The Summicron, hands down.<< Is there really that much difference between the 50mm 'cron and the 50mm 'lux? I recently went to buy the 50mm 'cron and walked out with the 'lux because of the speed; mind you, it was definitely `sold' to me. I've got some great results from my 35mm 'cron, but I'm sort of toying of buying the 35mm 'lux, again for the speed, but don't know of any difference concerning quality. Last week I bought the 24mm Asph + viewfinder, and found the 2.8 difficult at first - but not as much as using the 24 with a .85 TTL - so speed is probably my primary concern. I also put a deposit on a new 75mm 1.4 for pretty much the same reasons. If the 50mm 'cron has a major difference in optical quality over the 50mm 'lux, I'd like to know because I'll just the 'cron as well. Thanks, Matt. - ---------- >From: Paul Chefurka <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com> >To: "'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Subject: RE: [Leica] 35mm, 90mm, and now 50 mm? >Date: Mon, Sep 18, 2000, 10:39 am > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Bego Mario Garde [mailto:BegoMario.Garde@gmx.de] >> > [snip] >>Which one would be your choice, if you had a 35mm-Summicron and a >>90mm-Elmarit? > > The Summicron, hands down. If you don't mind buying used, the previous > version is optically identical and ergonomically superior (focus tab and > rigid removable hood). > Either it or the current version would be my choice. > > Paul >