Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Lee, Jonathan" wrote: > But you miss the point that marketing missteps, which I believe the Leica O > is, will have an impact on the company as a whole and will affect the > ability of Leica to invest more in the continuous improvement of the > rangefinder camera and the design of newer, better (lighter?!)lenses. Every > $ that went into the Leica O, form its marketing, design to manufacturing > process, is a $ that has been taken away from other aspects of Leica camera. Jonathan, Do you really think Leica is making the Leica O to loose money. I don't think they can play that game for the moment. I think it's the reverse which is true. The are making the Leica 0 for good cash in order to invest it in R&D. The same as they did with Millennium M6. And what are the M6TTL 0,58 and the 28/2 ASPH if they are not a"continuous improvement of the rangefinder camera and the design of newer, better (lighter?!)lenses" ? Don't worry, they will continue to improve both the camera and the lenses in the future. Lucien