Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ben Eden wrote: > > Hi All, > > I was wandering if anyone did compare the 35/2 ASPH with the pre-ASPH > version back to back for bokeh. I had both lenses for a short while and > regret not having done a systematic test - the few snaps that I was able to > take just proved that the ASPH has noticeably better resolution and field > flatness at f2 - no real news. Erwin says that these two have "similar" > bokeh. I'd appreciate any comments as I would like to have the ASPH's > resolution without losing my 35/2 fantastic bokeh that almost works as a > "depth of field extender", out-of-focus areas are both more recogniseable > and beautiful than for instance the 35/1,4 ASPH which I disqualify for this > very reason. > > Thanks and cheers, > > Ben Eden SOME guy would shrilly say the ASPH had TERRIBLE bokeh. But he augered in. The bokeh on mine seems great but i never had both to compare side by side. Mark William Rabiner