RE: [Leica] Interest in Leica 0

["B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>]

Obviously, Simon, this is a prime example of
ToEachHisOwn/That'sWhyTheyHaveHorseRaces....but I see this as yet another,
the latest,
ManInTheMoonKingofSiamWhoCanWeSuckerNowInsteadofputtingmoneyinrealcameradeve
lopmentproduct. The 1930s, era of The Great Depression, the rise of Adolph
H., the Rape of Nankin, and the beginings of 35 mm photography aren't
something I care to relive. As someone on one of the lists just noted, if I
want to relive that era of photography, I can get a Holga for $15.....But
enjoy...God knows I have my own weird quirks...:-)

B. D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Simon Lamb
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 4:37 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Interest in Leica 0
>
>
> So you won't be buying one then, so all the more for us ;-)  I
> think I will
> enjoy the experience of taking pictures with a Leica 0.  It may be on the
> mantel for many but I will certainly try and become proficient in its use.
> I would rather shell out my cash on something that enables me to
> relive the
> experience of taking photographs as they did in the early days of 35mm
> photography than on any of the so called special 'black paint first man on
> the moon some member of a royal family somewhere got married it's some
> obscure potentate's birthday so let's create a camera and con the populous
> out of some money' edition.
>
> Simon
>
> B. D. Colen wrote:
>
> > Sounds great? Right. If there hadn't been any developments in photo
> > equipment since 1923 it would really sound great. As it is it
> sounds like
> a
> > cunning little nick nack for the mantel....
> >
> > It is, after all, no more an original, or example of the original, than
> some
> > Franklin Mint collectible that so seems to charm the readers of Parade
> > Magazine. :-)
> >
> > B. D.
> >
> > >
> > > Martin Howard wrote:
> > >
> > > > Simon Lamb jotted down the following:
> > > >
> > > > > I haven't seen too much discussion on the Leica 0 that is
> due to be
> in
> > > Leica
> > > > > dealers at the end of October.
> > > >
> > > > Eh, what's a Leica 0??
> > > >
> > > > M.
> > >
> > >
> > > Martin (and Steve Beyer who asked the same question) here is
> the answer:
> > >
> > > Leica is to make a small number of the so-called Nullserie, the
> > > precursor of
> > > the Leica I.  It was first produced in 1923 and 1924.  The specs are:
> > >
> > > 35mm finder camera with non-interchangeable lens
> > > 24x36mm format
> > > Newton finder
> > > Aluminium casing, coated with artificial leather, and an interior of
> > > deep-drawn brass
> > > Horizontal-plane, mechanically controlled rubber cloth
> > > focal-plane shutter,
> > > non-overlapping when shutter is wound (lens cap on!)
> > > Exposure times of B, 1/20s, 1/50s, 1/100s, 1/200s, 1/500s
> > > Frame counter automatically counts from 0-40 (manual reset to
> 0 when new
> > > roll inserted)
> > > Leitz Anastigmat 50mm f/3.5 4 element 3 component multi-coated lens
> > > Continuous aperture setting with values of 3.5 / 4.5 / 6.3 / 9 / 12
> > > Focussing range infinity to 1m
> > > Leather lens cap permanently attached to body with a cord
> > > Film loaded by removable base (takes 35mm cartridge)
> > > 1/4" tripod thread
> > > H x L x D = 65mm x 133mm x 39mm (with lens collapsed)
> > > Weighs 470g
> > > Comes with (n)ever-ready case of brown cowhide leather with a carrying
> > > strap.
> > > Topplate and baseplate black lacquered.
> > >
> > > Sounds great.  Shutter speed selected by a dial on the top where
> > > you specify
> > > the size of the gap between the curtains.  2mm=1/500s and 50mm=1/20s
> > >
> > > There it is, and I bet it look great.
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>