Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Optimal Portrait Lenses
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:22:41 -0400

No problems observed - thus far - with flare and the AF version of the 85
1.4 Nikkor - Of course, the damn hood is the size of an industrial garbage
can!;-)
B. D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Dan Cardish
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 3:11 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Optimal Portrait Lenses
>
>
> WAIT!!
>
> I forgot one thing...The nikkor was a real bugger with flare in
> the studio.
>  It seemed much worse with this lens than with either the Minolta or Leica
> optics.  And I used it with the recommended hood.  I can recall posting
> something about it on a mailing list several years ago, and being told to
> look for a Contax lens hood which would fit but was a bit longer and might
> control the flare a bit better.  I never followed up on the advice.
>
> Dan C.
>
> At 02:33 PM 05-09-00 -0400, Thomas Donovan wrote:
> >Dan C.,
> >
> >>>sharpest (Nikkor 85 1.4 ) when compared with my Leica<<
> >>>apo 90.....sharpness seems to be most apparent literally<<
> >                            >>at portrait distances<<
> >
> >Whoa!  It's hard to imagine ;-)! Thanks for the great comparison.
> >
> >I'm close to placing an order for this optical gem today. Would
> >anyone else know how the Nikkor compares to the R-80 f1.4?
> >
> >I've got to add that the input from the LUG has been excellent!
> >Just think, we've got Leica gurus, recommending a Nikkor lens.
> >
> >Amazing ;-)!
> >
> >Tom D.
> >
> >
>