Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doesn't take much skill to be a wiseass..;-) He also noted that dirty, brassy, cloudy lens - and dirty and cloudy could well be temporary - seemed not to be rangefinder coupled and appeared to have what might be a very low serial number. I don't collect, have no interest in collection, but was trying to be helpful. B. D. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Paul > Chefurka > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 3:41 PM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] Hektor infos needed > > > >From: B. D. Colen [mailto:bdcolen@earthlink.net] > >Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 3:16 PM > >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >Subject: RE: [Leica] Hektor infos needed > > > > > >But isn't the question Robert is asking is whether or not, from his > >description of this particular Hektor, it sounds like it might > >be some rare > >piece for which someone on Ebay will pay a fortune? > > > >B. D. > > Let me see: "desperate condition, cludy, brassy and dirty". > Sounds like a > yummy collectible to me. But then, I got bored with the idea of > collecting > when I found out that philately wasn't a solitary sexual > practice, so I have > no idea what might turn those pervos on. To me rare junk is still just > junk. > > Paul >