Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] white dot and metering
From: "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:24:49 +0100
References: <NBBBIDNIGLFOKNLJCPLHGEJLEDAA.ddh@home.com>

Dan

I guess it is white because white has a very high reflectance of light
(about 95%) and so provides the meter with a good amont of light to work
with, and less denegrated light as the white does not absorb too much of
that which is reflected from the subject.  It is a dot so that the light is
concentrated in a small area rather than dispersed.

As for 13%, I too have seen this figure mentioned but, as I would presume
with most people who use an M6, once I had done some grey card tests I only
use my meter as a guide and often adjust the exposure to suit my needs.

Simon

Dan Honemann wrote:

> Ok, here's a dumb question (so those of you who have low tolerance for
dumb
> questions can skip to the next msg now).  The M6 TTL meters off of a white
> dot on the shutter curtain.  Why isn't the dot 18% grey?  Does the meter
> test light reflected off both the white dot and some of the black curtain
so
> that the composite represents grey?
>
> I'm assuming the meter works by comparing the reflected light through the
> lens to the light reflected off the white dot.
>
> And why do we use 18% grey cards anyway when "scientific studies now
> indicate that an average scene actually reflects 13% (not 18%) of the
light
> that falls on it" (Peter Burian, _National Geographic Photography Field
> Guide_, p.137)?
>
> Curious Dan
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Dan Honemann" <ddh@home.com> ([Leica] white dot and metering)