Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Vs: [Leica] Re: R lens tests (was: Re: R lens tests)
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:45:16 +0200

March 1976. Another example is test of 50 mm Summicron in June 1976 - it passed but with only "good".
All the best!
Raimo
photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen

- -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: Henning J. Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>

<snip>When they tested the Noctilux, it did fail their resolution test of the
>time at certain apertures, but they said in the text that the lens was so
>significant and remarkable in other ways and more than that, their
>standards were biased in favour of mainstream 1.4 and 1.8 lenses that they
>felt that the Noctilux test should be published anyways.
>
>This must have been in the late 70's or so.
>
>   *            Henning J. Wulff
>  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
> /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
> |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com