Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]ARTHUR, How do you know you weren't the "A" that was referred to? So, somehow you have a problem with my asking you to substantiate such an obviously absurd (and antagonistic, on a Leica list) claim, or am I just supposed to say "OK, gee, any claim you make is just, well, gotta be right"? If you can't back up a claim, then the claim is just hearsay. Do you disagree with that? If so, go look up the word "hearsay". If what you claimed is true, please provide the evidence. BTW, just what are those 'suspicions' you supposedly have? That I only believe facts that are substantiated, not silly claims that aren't? I find it funny that you, when asked to provide substantiation to your claim, find it necessary to turn to personal insults, instead of just providing the information. The only reason to do such, is because there is no validity to your claim. - ---------- From: ARTHURWG@aol.com Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 2:50 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?) My suspicions about A. have been confirmed as well. Arthur