Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica M2
From: "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 21:48:38 -0700
References: <336ECDAFDF7DD311B9E30090277AEE4102C64253@nt-exchange-bby.pmc-sierra.bc.ca> <399ACB5B.35AD2AFF@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <l03130301b5c17724b80b@[216.40.160.185]>

I am getting good results using the M$4 meters outdoors an indoors when it
is not too dark.  They are sure convenient to use.

Roland Smith
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Wilcox" <wilcox@tir.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 4:06 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica M2


> Steve:
>
> I find the easiest to use on the M2 to be the MR or MR4 because of the
> direct coupling. If I'm not using that or a spot meter, I'll use an old
> selenium celled Zeiss Ikophot most often.
>
> Ken Wilcox
>
> At 9:28 -0700 8/16/0, a fine scholar, Steve Caspersen wrote:
>
> >What meter do you suggest?
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
> >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 10:11 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica M2
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I think the Leica M2 is a GORGEOUS camera and I'd kill to have one.
> >> I have no problem with using a little separate meter.
> >> Mark William Rabiner
> >> :)
> >>
>
>
> ----
> Ken Wilcox                                Carolyn's Personal Touch
Portraits
>   preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com>
>           <kwilcox@gfn.org>
>
>
>

Replies: Reply from Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com> ([Leica] Re: Leica M2 and meters)
Reply from "Steve Caspersen" <mectau@home.com> ([Leica] Leica M2 and meters)
In reply to: Message from Paul Chefurka <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com> (RE: [Leica] Leica M2)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica M2)
Message from Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com> ([Leica] Re: Leica M2)