Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 8/5/00 1:16:49 AM Eastern Daylight Time, wvl@marinternet.com writes: << It went back to the shop were it plus a little cash was transformed into a 1980's 50 Summi that was outstanding. >> Next to your Summi M, almost any 50 can come up looking like a weak performer, or is it that the Canon 50/1.4 is a notoriously crappy loupe? Either way, the coll. 50 is no match for either of these two 50's, in my experience. Still, the consensus appears to be that the pejorative in question best applies to the Summar. Joe Sobel