Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....
From: chucko@siteconnect.com (Chuck Albertson)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:30:02 -0700
References: <75.7d4e546.26bc3353@aol.com> <023e01bffe43$f7e4e3a0$140a640a@cusackknowles.com> <398B1DCB.BD4A7F68@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

Your memory's spot on, Mark. He recommended using it at 1:50 or 1:75 for
most purposes, 1:100 for some really slow, contrasty films. I tend to use it
at 1:25 in the winter, 1:50 in the summer when the sun's actually visible
around here.

Chuck Albertson
Seattle, Wash.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....


> Chuck Albertson wrote:
> >
> > Bob Schwalberg was a hell of good writer, into the 1980's. I have a
> > photocopy of an article he wrote on Rodinal about 20 years ago, and
still
> > use it as a reference.
> >
> > Chuck Albertson
> > Seattle, Wash.
> >
> I believe it was he that stated in that article that to use it at 1:25 was
not
> better than D76 1:1.
> But to use it in it's higher dilutions.
> Hows my memory on this one?
> Mark Rabiner
>

In reply to: Message from Krechtz@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)
Message from chucko@siteconnect.com (Chuck Albertson) (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Dr. Strangelens, or....)