Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Exposing Tri-X at 320
From: BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:41:44 -0400

That's my understanding as well.  Overdeveloping increases contrast.  That's
why I rate tri-x at 200 and underdevelop.  To reduce contrast (and to get
more shadow detail).  Works great!

Bob Kramer

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Peterson Arthur G NSSC [SMTP:PetersonAG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL]
> Sent:	Tuesday, July 25, 2000 10:06 AM
> 
> Just a quick question from an ignoramus who doesn't develop his own stuff.
> You say that overexposing and underdeveloping increases contrast.
> 
> I had long understood that underexposing and overdeveloping increases
> contrast.  And somewhere, somehow (I can't recall and can't explain it), I
> had gotten the impression that, conversely, overexposing and
> underdeveloping
> rather decreases contrast.  Did you misstate this, or has my impression
> just
> plain been wrong?
> 
> Thanks in advance for the answer,
> 
> Art Peterson

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Exposing Tri-X at 320)