Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Noctilux
From: "Julian Thomas" <mimesis@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:42:16 +0100
References: <200007211447.QAA01941@bird.de.uu.net> <397879A2.75B91CE6@webshuttle.ch>

Most people around here seem to have proved a causal link between a Noctilux
and babies - so if the latter isn't on the agenda, better stay away from the
former!!

Julian

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Wajsman" <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Noctilux


> Tim,
>
> Another thing you can do is to bring your M to the shop, mount the
Noctilux
> on it, and shoot a series of test pictures, making sure that you cover all
> the apertures. This is another advantage of buying locally.
>
> Nathan
>
> Tim Spragens wrote:
>
> > I'd have no worries if it were offered directly from the shop, but
> > consignment items don't have as much protection. I'll probably pick
> > it up tomorrow, if it's still there - no one seems to think there's a
> > bad batch, and this one looks like it was owned by someone with
> > short-lived noctilust.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tim Spragens
> > http://www.borderless-photos.com
>
> --
> Nathan Wajsman
> Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland
>
> e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
>
> General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
> Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
> Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/
>
>
>

Replies: Reply from Rick Dykstra <rdandcb@cybermac.com.au> (Re: [Leica] Re: Noctilux)
In reply to: Message from "Tim Spragens" <t.spragens@cityweb.de> ([Leica] Re: Noctilux)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Re: Noctilux)