Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Guy Bennett <guy.bennett@wanadoo.fr> wrote: >i don't mean to sound snide, but the iiig is a nearly 40-year-old camera and thus it doesn't seem all that surprising that it might 'fail' during a shoot. >what i do find surprising is that a professional photographer would be using such old cameras for assignments. Hell, my IIIg isn’t old - like fine brandy it’s just matured a little! Now my Contax II was built before my dad met my mum - that's old <grin> I may be taking pictures for publication, but I’m not a professional photographer in the commonly-accepted sense of the term. (If I was relying on my limited photographic skills to earn my living I’d starve.) I’m a journalist, a species which wields a pen and notebook. 25 years ago I often had a tame photographer in tow who’d take the pics I needed, but in today’s world of technical journalism, the "hack" usually has to take his own pics. The choice is thus to fumble with the office ‘loaner’ camera, or to use your own (which you are familiar with). Given that technical journalism isn’t exactly the road to riches, the equipment which is used tends to reflect the age of the journalist, so it’s not unusual for us grey-haired geezers to be toting classic kit from the 1960s or 1970s. (For example, one fellow-editor uses a beautiful black-paint Canon mechanical SLR.) Since my ‘hobby photography’ is almost entirely done with classic Leitz-era Leicas, every time I head for a trade show or facility, one of those cameras is pressed into service for work. At a press facility or equipment demonstration, I’d normally use either an SL2 or an M2. (My M6 spends to much time in the Leica repair department to be a candidate.) However, at a trade show my shoulder bag will gradually fill with dozens of press kits and brochures, so I want a camera which is as small and light as possible. Normally that means my CL, but with that needing its shutter cleaned and re-lubed, the choice fell on the IIIg (whose shutter had been tested at a recent Leica clinic and pronounced spot-on). I'd become so used to the reliability of classic Leicas that I'd never really thought about getting them CLAd. If they weren't broke, I wasn't going to fix them (a philosophy you often hear expressing during LUG discussions on the need for CLAs). Alas, in the course of two years, most developed shutter problems. Taking the Contax II with me was unplanned. It was a recent purchase which I’d had no chance to use, I had a free day in Paris before the trade show began, so on a last-minute impulse I decided to take it along. Anyway, the Farnborough air show is only a few weeks away, so with both the CL and IIIg out of action my newly-acquired Contax TVS II will be the weapon of choice (I don’t need pics of aircraft in flight). After all these years it will be strange not to be using a Leica... Are there any other print journalists on the LUG who have to take their own pics? If so, own up guys - what kit do you carry? Regards, Doug Richardson