Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Has anyone seen, handled, bought and/or used a 280mm f/2.8. I can only endorse the comments made by Ted, Roy and Harrison..........it is a cracking lens. I bought mine secondhand last September. Optically it was in good condition but the cosmetic appearance was poor. As the focussing mount was sloppy, I handed it in to Leica UK for repair and a CLA. Before I knew it, they had returned it to Solms and, afterwards, they explained that APO lenses could only be serviced at the German factory. Solms took three months to complete the work and I received it back last Friday. The cost was reasonable at 240 GBP and they have done an excellent job. They even repainted the aperture and distance markings on the aperture ring and barrel (which i didn't expect). So, if you see a well-used secondhand lens available it is still worth considering if the price is right. I'm certainly glad I took the plunge. My 280/2.8 is a 1986 vintage and the glass looks as good as new now. > Also, when used with an R8, the 2.8 aperture will appear in LED display as 3.4, but the metering appears to be on the mark. Roy, your mention of this intrigued me and I checked on my R8 and I got the same readout on the LED display. Wonder why this happens? Finally, the lens comes with a neat handgrip. I was sceptical about its effectiveness but followed LUG advice and find it is very useful. You can use this lens handhold this lens. Cheers, Paul.