RE: [Leica] Vintage M observations

[BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: drodgers@nextlink.com
> Subject: [Leica] Vintage M observations
> 
> I
> decided to use my M3, which had been locked away for some time. There's
> nothing like the M3 framelines and a 50mm lens. I thought to myself, why
> did I need an M6? After a week or so of very average use (a half dozen
> rolls shot) I noticed that my formerly mint M3 was shedding large pieces
> of
> vulcanite. Plus one of the strap lugs had come loose (and I didn't even
> have a strap attached).  As much as they appeal to me in a "classic"
> sense,
> I'm  apprehensive about using older M bodies. I'm particularly concerned
> about the M3, since it has a unique viewfinder. If it breaks, is it even
> repairable. Missing vulcanite is not that big a deal, but it reminded me
> of
> why I like new bodies. Everytime I hear about how well constructed the
> older bodies are, I remind myself that I was well constructed two decades
> ago. But alas, time can take a toll. In that respect, I think the newer M
> bodies are a pretty good value, considering.
> 
	[BOB KRAMER]  The moral of this story is don't let your camera sit
around for years without using it!  Or if you do, get it serviced before
putting it into use.

	As far as components of the rangefinder assembly, from my
conversations with Ms. Krauter, the only thing that she can't fix is
de-silvering of the prism.  They were  *made* to be repairable, unlike the
"replace, don't adjust" design philosophy of the M6.  Not that the M6 isn't
a fine camera worthy of any short focal length shooter, you understand.  But
no reason why a "classic" Leica can't be an excellent user camera either.
My M3 is still humming right along after 45 years, just like me!  :-)

	Bob Kramer
	Atlanta, GA