Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Incidentally,why are there so few women on the LUG? Seemsa sham e.
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:20:38 -0400

Or well healed boys...;-)

B. D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Tina Manley
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 11:11 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Incidentally,why are there so few women on the LUG?
> Seemsa sham e.
> 
> 
> At 04:22 PM 6/29/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >Tina,
> >
> >Bob said it in different words than I did when you where away 
> recently. My
> >contention is that women see cameras, lenses and accessories strictly as
> >tools to achieve an end result whereas, while  men also use them 
> as tools,
> >some also see them as jewels, toys and objects to be venerated as well.
> >
> >What do you think, especially based on the fact that LUG is 
> always mired in
> >equipment talk and only "occasionally" we come up with gems?
> >
> >Joe
> 
> Hi, Joe -
> 
> Well, I've always heard that the only difference between men and boys is 
> the cost of their toys.  I guess that means that all of the male LUGnuts 
> are real men!
> 
> Tina
> 
> 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> http://www.tinamanley.com
> 
> 

Replies: Reply from "Julian Thomas" <mimesis@btinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally,why are there so few women on the LUG? Seemsa sham e.)