Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I know it's changing the subject slightly, but I would go a good deal further than finding Sally Mann's family work to be "theatrical contrivances." I would suggest that they represent a form of child abuse, or, if that term is too strong for some, then they are examples of serious exploitation of children. I wonder if the term "informed consent" means anything to her? Which has a great deal to do with her as a mother and a human being, and nothing to do with her landscapes, or any of her skills as a photographer. B. D. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Matthew > Phillips > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 9:29 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Re:Sally Mann, digest V17 #195 > > > >Sally Mann, in here latest landscape work has managed to capture > an almost > >Matthew Brady/Civil War type look by using old lenses she has > collected, as > >well as playing with development and printing (some she shot on > Ortho film, > >which give a different feel again). > > While I'm no fan of Sally's prima donna persona, and find her family > portraits to be theatrical contrivances (albeit exquisitely printed... by > someone else), her recent southern landscape series are sublimely > beautiful. The one's she'd recently shown at the Reynold's Gallery in > Richmond, Virginia were made with an archaic 'wet-plate' process. The > process is tedious and dangerous (very toxic), requiring that the negative > plate be exposed while still wet with freshly applied emulsion. > In the Mann > landscapes you can see the surge marks of the emulsion sliding down the > plate during exposure. Exposures are a hit-or-miss guess due to the speed > variability of the chemical soup, but at best require very long exposures. > While the high contrast tonality of Sally's landscapes are not neccesarily > inherent to the wet-plate process, she uses it to her pictorial advantage. > What is remarkable about these images is the degree of atmosphere and a > 'sense of place' that is retained with very little apparent detail. If you > think of these images as romantic, then its comes from the premise that > romance is about careful editing. > > Regards, > M.Phillips > >