Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:
From: "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 14:54:06 -0700
References: <v0401171fb5744305ff8a@[209.53.32.129]>

My first Noctilux pictures were at a dinner party, illuminated by two
candles.  EI 800 with TMax400, f/1.0 at 1/15.  Having two candles didn't
really increase the brightness for exposure purposes, as the more distant
candle functioned more as a fill to the nearer candle, which served as the
main light.  Actually turned out to be a decent lighting set up.  The
contrast control of the Noctilux shots was terrific, and beyond my best
expectations.  I was hooked.

Tom Schofield

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 2:41 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re:


> At 9:12 PM +0200 6/19/00, Robert Appleby and Sue Darlow wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >There is no great mystery here. If you need one candle to get the shot
with
> >a Noctilux wide open under a certain circumstance, you'll need 2 candles
> >with a Summilux.
> >
> ><<<<<<<
> >4 I think. Intensity = something squared? As your kids grow, you can use
> >slower and slower lenses for their brithday cake shots - f4.0 is
sufficient
> >when they're 64 years old - enter the tri-elmar!
> >Rob.
> >Robert Appleby and Sue Darlow
> >Via Bellentani 36
> >41100 Modena
> >Italy
> >Tel/fax [39] 059 303436
>
> If you have one candle, and can make the shot with a Noctilux, you will
> need 2 with the Summilux (which has an entrance pupil approximately 1/2
the
> area of the Noctilux, both wide open). If you move twice as far away from
> the candle, you will need either 4 candles or EI12,800 film or....
> Intensity varies as the inverse of the square of the distance.
>
>    *            Henning J. Wulff
>   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>

In reply to: Message from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> ([Leica] Re:)