Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] discussion on F*****s
From: "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 11:34:49 -0700
References: <OFAA1727E6.03EEE904-ON882568FE.00606928@internal.nextlink.net>

Does this mean that we have to start referring to f****rs as Wavelength
Modification Devices, or Front Element Protection Systems?

Dan ( Who promises no to f****r out FEPS ) Post
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <drodgers@nextlink.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 10:44 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0


>
> Dan
>
> >>To whom this may concern (and it may not concern very many at all):  If
> anyone on the LUG posts something that they particularly want me to read,
> please do not have the word "f*****" appear anywhere in the post.   Such
> messages are automatically being f*****ed to the trash bin by my email
> reader.<<
>
> Consider it a blessing as you've probably been spared post after post
> regarding whether or not one should use those round UV things as lens
> protection. Or did you put the f***** on your e-mail to f***** the word
> f***** precisely for that reason?
>
> Dave
>

In reply to: Message from drodgers@nextlink.com ([Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)