Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: noctilux 50 f1.0
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:24:07 -0700
References: <NCBBJJFDBJBLCEDPPLKGMEFHKJAA.msadat@pacbell.net> <3931AA75.1D2E62D2@home.com> <3.0.5.32.20000613172942.0090ed30@pop.microtec.net> <3946BE12.6978A915@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <000901bfd58d$a70fd180$953d18d1@PACBELL.NET> <4.1.20000613165449.05848480@gateway.photoaccess.com>
Jim Brick wrote:
>
> At 04:25 PM 6/13/00 -0700, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
> >That's ok i've got a filter filter filter!
> >Mark Rabiner
> >is there neutral density in there somewhere?
>
> Yes, if they are yellow, cyan, and magenta.
>
> Jim
What's the point of doing a joke if someones going to get it!
Mark :-) Rabiner
In reply to:
Message from mehrdad sadat <msadat@pacbell.net> ([Leica] noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> ([Leica] WAS: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative. now 50mm)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)