Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 16:25:44 -0700
References: <NCBBJJFDBJBLCEDPPLKGMEFHKJAA.msadat@pacbell.net> <3931AA75.1D2E62D2@home.com> <3.0.5.32.20000613172942.0090ed30@pop.microtec.net> <3946BE12.6978A915@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <000901bfd58d$a70fd180$953d18d1@PACBELL.NET>
Tom Schofield wrote:
>
> Sorry, Mark, but he'll never see your response -- the "filter filter" pun
> just got filtered! I guess we'll now have to use f***** for Dan.
>
> Tom
That's ok i've got a filter filter filter!
Mark Rabiner
is there neutral density in there somewhere?
In reply to:
Message from mehrdad sadat <msadat@pacbell.net> ([Leica] noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> ([Leica] WAS: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative. now 50mm)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)