Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't know...perhaps someone on the list will have a quote either new or used. However, I do know that someone recently purchased a new 14033 lens cap for US$30, so I can only imagine what the replacement shade will run. Buzz - -----Original Message----- From: Bill Satterfield [mailto:cwsat@cyberhighway.net] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 9:31 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and Charlton Heston What is the price? Buzz Hausner wrote: > Off-list greetings Scott! > > You know, until yesterday I was totally unaware that the Skinny T-E > had ever been supplied with that dreadful rubber shade. I was indeed > fortunate in that mine came equipped with the 12575. I believe that John > Collier has provided us with a message that clarifies the whole filter on a > rubber shade issue. You can still purchase the 12575 and proper lens cap as > new, but be seated before you hear the price. Best bet, go to a show or > swap-meet and try to find an older set. > > Regards, > > Buzz > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sonnar502@aol.com [mailto:Sonnar502@aol.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 5:06 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and Charlton Heston > > Buzz - No, indeed, I was referring cursedly to the ludicrous folding rubber > hood for the Tele. Not only do I feel it too shallow, the thing simply > won't > stay uh excuse the expression... erect if even slightly disturbed. I'd > would > INDEED love to find a proper metal (or even plastic) one that either clips > on > and reverses, or at least that I can screw into the regular threads on the > lens itself. > > So then, am I to understand from your post that something *is* amiss with > the > threads on the hood retaining ring of my T-E? I kinda thought as much, but > I've never really looked into it.... Am I also to infer from you that such > a > proper shade is out there? Like you said, Buzz, surely someone must have a > # > for it... > > BTW: I realized when my own post showed up on my machine that I hadn't > finished the last sentence! Sorry; got interrupted. I meant to say that I > guess you see kinda like me, Johnny, 'though I, alas, cannot claim any > images > with anywhere near the impact with which yours ont he website hit me. > Awesome! > > Scott