Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Your comment about the ASA dial moving reminds me to share a warning - on a recent trip, a roll of Provia F had paint on the canister scratched off and DX'ed to 1600. I didn't notice because I was shooting night shots of fountains in Rome, at approximately 1/8 sec. indicated (should have been 1-2 sec.). I was hoping that between the 2 1/2 stop push my lab would do and my bracketing that some would come out, but they are still seriously underexposed. Didn't notice 'till I reloaded with another roll that DX'ed properly and saw the exposure change. Thereafter, I checked every time I reloaded. Tom Schofield - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard W. Hemingway" <rheming@attglobal.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Advertures with the R8 > Levi, > > >As longs as it's an R! No N stuff! > > Yes, I was Nikon SLR person from the first F to the F4 and most everything > in between. I didn't like the feel of the AF lenses. The R8 has a lot of > the feel of the F4 when used manually. However, I lost most of a trips > pictures with the F4 when the ASA setting inadvertently moved and I didn't > know it until after the trip and the blacker pics came back. The Leica R > lenses - super!!! > > > >The 19... You do get lost in the view but... one can juggle the > transparency of the RF with the thrill of the 19 view. And indeed that > slide (almost forgot!)looks like it did - precisely. Not because of > experience and predictability of the lens but because of what I saw in > real-time*. It's not a comment on the situation but a 19 view of it! *And > the photo is essentially also that view, however irrelevant. The 100APO - > is also... BIG! Keeps me($)from that 90APOASPHS! Barely. > > I had the 100 APO at one time and loved it. However the 80/1.4 works for > me. I once shot the same pic with the 100 and the 80 and found very little > difference between them (non-macro) plus two more stops. > > >But the M6 and 50 summicron? Why do I not seem able to take that 50 off? > And both off of me? This is just unsurpassed. It's actually hard to use > anything else at all. Results? What does it matter? The 50 is more of an > extension that a tool. I'll get another body and just glue that 50 > summicron on there. > > I felt that way about the M6 and 35/1.4 asph. Used it for almost > everything and the 90/2.8 once in a while. I could get along with the 35 > and the 75/1.4, but I see better with the 80/1.4-R > > >Also - the R8/R7 thing is not right. I just feel stupid with that thing on > me, however good it is, and it is. > > I understand what you are saying - I wish that I could afford both systems. > > Take care, > > Dick Hemingway > Plano, TX > > >