Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have now spent a couple of days prowling the streets of Soho with my new M4-P. (Yes, finally figured out that this is indeed what it is; Sherry K. worked on it, and tells me it's one of the first ever made.) As I don't own any Leica optics, currently (and am kicking myself for selling that pristine Summitar), I can only report on the lenses I do have. I shot one roll with the Canon 50/1.4 LTM -- a roll of Fuji NPH, because my beloved Reala is only intermittently available in New York -- and a roll of T400CN with the new Cosina/Voigtlander 75/2.5. The 50/1.4 I am familiar with; it was simply a question of adjusting to the M4-P after working with my old Canon 7. (While I love those Canon bodies, and can get good results with them, there really is nothing like the rangefinder patch on the M. The Canon gives you this amorphous floating bright spot, whose edges resemble flare, whereas the Leica really does offer an edge so sharp that you can use it as a split image. But then, you know all this.) I'll simply recap my impressions of that Canon 50: if the Summicron is the King of Bokeh, then this is the Heir Apparent. I *adore* the OOF characteristcs of this lens. Which leads me to the Voigtlander... I was nervous about this new lens. While I am more than happy with the 25mm Skopar, it exhibits a slightly wiry bokeh: less of an issue with a wide than with a telephoto. In 75mm, bokeh *truly matters*. And my work these days emphasizes blur: some of my photos have only a token object in focus. Also nervous-making was the possibility of focusing problems, despite the smaller aperture -- I've heard enough complaints about the Leica 75. Okay, enough buildup: this Voigtlander is nothing short of astonishing. Gorgeous. Figures sharply-focused stand out in that preternatural way that I associate with Zeiss, and the background blur is exquisite. Easily another Pretender to the Throne (if I can extend this dead metaphor until its bones crack). Also praisworthy are the ergonomics. I am working on my stealth photography (a difficult business with my other "miniatures" -- Contax SLRs) and I've had some nice results. And have come close, I suspect, to having my head kicked in. The 75mm is a trickier beast in the field than a 50 or a 30: you can stand further away, but focusing is more critical. I find it takes me an extra split second to ascertain that my unwitting victim is in focus. By which point the quarry is often witting. (I have a great shot of a woman staring at me with contempt, as I photograph her and her friend shopping for hats.) The short throw on the 75mm, combined with just the right damping, makes for surprisingly quick work. I'm doing a series in which I capture people's reactions as they browse through photography books in bookstores, and I got some nice shots with the Voigtlander of "readers" carefully analyzing Taschen art/porn. Nobody even slightly aware of my presence. And the lens manages to do a decent job rendering even the images on the page that they're reading -- not bad for a short tele, hand-held at 1/30th. I figure that all of this practice with longer lenses will make me a stealth virtuoso by the time I can afford that 35mm Summicron. (Pardon the long post. I get excited.) Douglas Cooper