Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LHSA M6
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 14:06:19 -0500
References: <392EA73E.782AE20A@cyberhighway.net> <000701bfc71a$b39189c0$bd3d18d1@PACBELL.NET>

It is limited to a 90 day order period per the fine print in the LHSA order
form. This would limit the production, wouldn't it?

Tom Schofield wrote:

> I would really like to get an LHSA, but yesterday, I was taking a hard look
> at the price differential.   Tamarkin had 10% off new, plus the $150 rebate,
> and free shipping if you say you saw it on the internet, so a brand new M6
> TTL .72 would come to $1645 delivered, or $1735 for a 0.85, compared to
> $2595 or $2695 for an LHSA.  And, will it have collectors value like the
> Millenium given there is no limitation in number?  My $0.02.
>
> Tom Schofield
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Satterfield" <cwsat@cyberhighway.net>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 12:33 PM
> Subject: [Leica] LHSA M6
>
> > I thought I had my mind made up to get one of these. Now, I am having
> > second thoughts. Is this a sought after camera that LUG members would
> > buy if money was not a factor. In other words, is it a highly prized
> > item. I would use it  and not worship it. Any thoughts, pro or con?
> >
> >

In reply to: Message from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net> ([Leica] LHSA M6)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] LHSA M6)