Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Noctilux Focusing (was Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheapalternative)
From: "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 14:28:03 +0100
References: <B553F37E.4056%howard.390@osu.edu>

Martn

Thanks for adding to my already great embarassment ;-)

Simon

Amateur efforts at http://www.phoenixdb.co.uk/leica


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Howard" <howard.390@osu.edu>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: Noctilux Focusing (was Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the
cheapalternative)


>
> Simon Lamb jotted down the following:
>
> > I could not see
> > the subject well enough to know if I had proper focus on it.  Is the f/1
> > Noctilux that much brighter that focusing is easier?
>
> Dude, this is a rangefinder!  You can focus it with a lens cap on ;)
>
> M.
>
> --
> Martin Howard                 | Trying to determine human performance by
> Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU   | experiments is nothing but the ritual of
> email: howard.390@osu.edu     | The Ballet for the Gods of Invariance.
> www: http://mvhoward.i.am/    +-------------------------------------------
>
>

Replies: Reply from Ebert Steele <k5cad@prodigy.net> (Re: Noctilux Focusing (was Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheapalternative))
In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu> (Re: Noctilux Focusing (was Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative))