Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: "Stephen A. Talesnick" <stephen@talesnick.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 16:23:52 -0700
References: <003c01bfc67e$1319cc60$1974fdcc@BryanCaldwell> <3.0.2.32.20000526061908.00fecb24@pacific.net.sg>
 
WRONG STEPHEN, I am stephen@earthlink.net and have been for over 5 years.
Please have your stephen check with earthlink and get the correct address.
Thank you.  stephen@earthlink.net

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "D Khong" <dkhong@pacific.net.sg>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 11:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative


> Steve Unsworth wrote:
> >Just out of interest, is the metering on an M6 accurate at such low light
> >levels?
>
> In my experience, yes.
>
> Dan K.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
In reply to: Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg> (RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)