Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: manual focus wildlife action (was: Re: [Leica] Thanks!! OT Nikon F5)
From: Simon Lamb <s_lamb@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 00:19:20 +0100
References: <20000514200333.13792.qmail@web1103.mail.yahoo.com>

Michael

I assume ***** means Nikon?  Can't think of any other five letter words.

Simon

Michael Scarpitti wrote:

>
>
> --- Doug Herr <telyt560@cswebmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 May 2000, Simon Lamb wrote:
> >
> > > so that I can understand how non AF people operate
> > is fast > action, what are
> > > your (and the groups) opinion on this.
> > >
> > > You are tracking a lioness stalking a hers of
> > wildebeest and you know that you
> > > are going to see a high speed hunt in action.
> > Suddenly the lioness accelerates
> > > and gives chase, dodging this way and that as a
> > single young wildebeest tries to
> > > evade capture.  The action is happening realtime
> > and sometimes the animals are
> > > passing behind trees.
> > >
> > > Do you use your super SLR with predictive AF,
> > focus lock-on so that you don't
> > > refocus when the action goes behind obstacles,
> > colour metering so you can forget
> > > about exposures as they will be spot on and high
> > shutter speeds because you has
> > > 400 film in the camera and don't have time to
> > change rolls.  You get 36 frames of
> > > action captured in about 4 seconds, five seconds
> > to change to new film, and off
> > > again.
> > >
> > > OR
> > >
> > > M6 or R8 rangefinder/manual focus camera with none
> > of the above.
> > >
> > > Now, don't shoot me down in flames.  As I have
> > said, my new M6 is great and I
> > > love it but it is not the tool for the job IMHO
> > for the scenario above.  My F5
> > > is.  So, as so many have said before, the picture
> > counts and I know what will
> > > give me the best chance of getting it.
> > >
> > > I would be interested in finding out how others
> > with M6 or R8 would approach this
> > > situation.  I know that many have said they were
> > sports action photogs before AF
> > > existed, so I would be interested to learn of any
> > techniques that could work in
> > > this type of scenario.
> > >
> > > Simon
> >
> > Simon,
> >
> > My assumption in the scenario you've presented is
> > that the photographer is using one of N****'s long,
> > fast AF lenses on a solid tripod, possibly with a
> > Wimberly tripod head.  Supposedly an ideal equipment
> > setup.
> >
> > First, I'd ditch the tripod.  Wildife action doesn't
> > happen in predictable locations, as it might on a
> > racetrack or a playing field.  It may be in front of
> > me, to either side, above or behind me.  My 400mm
> > and 560mm lenses are hand-held lenses, using a
> > shoulder stock.  I've tripped over tripods too
> > often, and lost too many shots moving the tripod, to
> > consider using one aside from static situations.
> >
> > Second, I'll ditch a lens that's too heavy to use
> > hand-held.  Leica's f/6.8 Telyts will do quite
> > nicely: a simple two-element acromat at the end of a
> > long aluminum tube make a very light-weight lens.
> >
> > Third, a traditional concentric-ring focus control
> > is out.  Use a sliding-focus lens like the Novoflex
> > or Leica f/6.8 Telyts.  With a little practice
> > they're intuitive.
> >
> > Fourth, use a viewfinder to die for.  Best choice is
> > a Leicaflex SL or SL2, the next best is the Leica
> > R8.  Fortunately both the Leicaflex and the R8 are
> > big enough that I can keep a solid grip on the
> > camera as I'm following the wildlife going through
> > their activities.
> >
> > Fifth, keep the camera simple enough that I can't
> > inadvertantly set the wrong AF or metering mode.
> >
> > I'm using the f/6.8 Telyts and Leicaflex SL camera
> > bodies for my wildlife photos.  The focus is quick
> > and positive no matter what the background is, no
> > matter where the critter is in the viewfinder, even
> > when the animal ducks behind a bush.  I've only used
> > an R8 for a day, and with familiarity (and the right
> > diopter setting!) it would be as easy to use as the
> > SL.  I can track fast action with ease, swinging the
> > hand-held lens around far more easily than walking
> > around a tripod, and don't have to hunt for stable
> > footing for the tripod.  If I can stand, sit or lie
> > down, I've got a stable lens.  The lens can be used
> > at shutter speeds as slow as 1/60 sec (400mm) with
> > excellent results.  The SL's selective meter, a dumb
> > CdS meter cell, has consistently given me excellent
> > results on chrome film.
> >
> > I've been in groups of photographers where the
> > advantages of the fast-handling manual equipment
> > made the difference between getting the picture and
> > missing it because due to tripod fumbling or
> > incorrect meter/AF/motor mode settings.
> >
>
> The F5 is a piece of *****
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/

In reply to: Message from Michael Scarpitti <mikescarpitti@yahoo.com> (Re: manual focus wildlife action (was: Re: [Leica] Thanks!! OT Nikon F5))