Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re:Consensus? Skopar 24mm
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 14:14:37 -0400

Well the Nokton (Cosina) 50 1.5, with a LTM to M adapter, is about $500-525.
What's the Summilux, which is optically not quite as good, $1600-1700?
The 75 2.5, which is good, but not as good as the 75 Summilux 1.4, is about
1/5th of the price of the Leica lens....and so on...

Except for the 50, the Cosina's aren't as "good" as their Leica
counterparts, but that doesn't mean they aren't "good." And it also doesn't
mean that they aren't a good way for someone getting into Leica photography
to expand his or her lens range at reasonable cost....I know it will come as
a shock to many on this list, but some of us are using Leica Ms because they
are the best RANGEFINDER cameras available, and have good optics...and if
Canon or Nikon made good rangefinders, and Leica didn't but made great
reflexes, we would still be using Canons or Nikons because we want a
RANGEFINDER camera....


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of
DonjR43198@aol.com
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 1:04 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Consensus? Skopar 24mm


In a message dated 4/7/00 11:55:41 AM Central Daylight Time,
bdcolen@earthlink.net writes:

<< Excellent point....Nor, I guess, would someone looking at two photos side
by
 side, of different subjects, comment on the sharpness of the lenses they
 were shot with, rather than on the photos themselves, UNLESS one lens was a
 coke bottle bottom...and MTF graphs aside, that doesn't seem to be the case
 with the Cosinas. I know it's certainly not the case with the Nokton, which
 produces terrific results...
  >>
What is the comparable price of the Cosinas, Nokton and Leica lenses?

Don R.