Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What is the court's opinion of the 35 asph 2.0? Is this a lens deserving of daily use and why? Thanks in advance steve At 08:37 AM 3/24/00 -0800, you wrote: >It is an upgrade indeed: No loss in image quality and the gain of a full >stop. In my book, that's an upgrade - not to say that if you don't need the >extra stop, there's no upgrading the Summicron ASPH. :-) >B. D. >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mark >Rabiner >Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 4:48 AM >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] FS: 35mm Summicron ASPH and IIIf with Summitar > > >Nathan Wajsman wrote: >> >> Friends, >> >> I have an opportunity to upgrade my 35mm M lens to a Summilux at a >> reasonable price, and to fund it, I am selling the following items: >> >> 1) 35mm Summicron-M ASPH (latest version, serial no. 3785xxx). Bought >><Snip> > >Is moving to the Summilux from the 35mm Summicron-M ASPH an upgrade? >I'm not sure that's necessarily so. >Mark Rabiner > > To verify source, check public key PGP at ldap://certserver.pgp.com