Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Is the "M" designation for the thin tele-elmarit on the lens itself? The fat and thin lenses that I examined both appeared to have "Tele-Elmarit" only, on them. Am I looking in the wrong place? >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:09:01 -0800 >From: Paul Chefurka <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com> >Subject: RE: [Leica] tele-elmarit 90 > >That's "fat" (T-E) vs. "thin" (T-E-M). > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Howard Davis [mailto:HDavis@slcearch.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 4:47 PM >>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >>Subject: RE: [Leica] tele-elmarit 90 >> >> >>I noticed, in Erwin Put's "Leica Papers" reference to Tele-Elmarit vs. >>Tele-Elmarit-M. Is he referring to "Fat" vs. "Thin"? Or, is this a >>distinction between two versions of the "Thin" design? > >------------------------------