Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: RE: [Leica] tele-elmarit 90
From: Paul Chefurka <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:09:01 -0800
 
That's "fat" (T-E) vs. "thin" (T-E-M).

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Howard Davis [mailto:HDavis@slcearch.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 4:47 PM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: RE: [Leica] tele-elmarit 90
>
>
>I noticed, in Erwin Put's "Leica Papers" reference to Tele-Elmarit vs. 
>Tele-Elmarit-M. Is he referring to "Fat" vs. "Thin"? Or, is this a 
>distinction between two versions of the "Thin" design?