Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: 35mm versus 120
From: "Mueller, Rob" <rob.mueller@eds.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:10:11 -0500

The fact that he used a Hasselblad is not the 'joke' I was referring to. 

Rob Mueller
Studies in Black and White
www.studiesinblackandwhite.com 
rob@studiesinblackandwhite.com





- -----Original Message-----
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:austin@darkroom.com]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 7:21 PM
To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: 35mm versus 120



No, Rob, I am not joking, of course.  I know for a fact AA owned, and used 
a Hasselblad for 20 years or so.  Don Imus (sp?) bought this Hasselblad at 
auction sometime in the last year or two for quite a large sum of money.

> you're joking, of course!

>Rob Mueller

- -----Original Message-----

>> see Ansel Adams' using a 35 for his specific type of landscape work.

>It is my (possibly misinformed) belief that he used Hasselblads more than
>LF...