Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] apo 90 versus 4/150
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 11:24:05 -0800

Jeff Spirer wrote:
> 
> At 09:09 AM 3/19/00 -0800, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
> >A VERY interesting post ruined by this "wishful thinking" last paragraph,
> >Mike.
> >Showing a stack of prints to people is better "research" than the study of
> >MTF graphs?
> >And reduces the study of MTF graphs to "wishful thinking"?
> 
> If the supposed end result of photography is a photograph that someone will
> <cherish><show><sell><publish>, then the most important thing is the end
> result.  I have never successfully hung an MTF graph on the wall.  I have
> done the other things, and to be perfectly honest, Mike's methodology is a
> lot more important to me than any scientific testing.
> 
> I realize that many people, including many Leica owners, have cameras for
> reasons other than making wonderful photographs, but that's another story,
> and they can live happily with their MTF charts and carefully preserved
> cameras.
><Snip> 
The point is that BOTH MTF graphs and real time same size print evaluations are
both valuable and needed.
Mark Rabiner